Legal Opinion

In Re Drayton

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 8, 2002No. 25439PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and Disciplinary Counsel have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the Agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to the imposition of any sanction deemed appropriate by this Court. We accept the Agreement and impose a definite suspension of ninety days from the practice of law. The facts as admitted in the Agreement are as follows.

Facts

In 1993, this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law because of his failure to complete the Continuing Legal Education…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re DraytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. In re DraytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API