Legal Opinion

Stucker Fork Conservancy District v. Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1992No. 93A02-9108-EX-370PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellant Stucker Fork Conservancy District (Stucker) appeals the Order of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (Commission), approved July 81, 1991, which assessed Stucker the Public Utility Annual Fee.1 We restate the issue formulated at the pre-appeal conference as follows: Whether the assessment against Stucker must be the fee attributable to a municipal utility?

We affirm.

The Stucker Fork Conservancy District was established on April 9, 1964, pursuant to what is now I.C. 13-8-8-1 (Burns Code Ed.1990), for the purposes, inter alia, of flood prevention and control,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. International Bakers Services, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Martin v. Ben Davis Conservancy DistrictIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Guinn v. LightIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Irmscher v. McCue Ex Rel. McCueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. City of Muncie v. CampbellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States Gypsum, Inc. v. Indiana Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hamilton Southeastern Utilities, Inc. v. Indiana Utility Regulatory CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Clinton Township Water Co. v. City of ClintonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Knob Hill Development LLC ASB LLC RPO Construction, Inc. Written Builders LLC v. Town of Georgetown, IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API