Legal Opinion
United States Gypsum, Inc. v. Indiana Gas Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided September 22, 2000No. 93S02-9904-EX-251PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
Affiliates of two Indiana natural gas utilities created ProLiance Energy for the purpose of procuring wholesale natural gas supply for the utilities. Opponents complained that ProLiance was an improper attempt to avoid state regulation and petitioned the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission to disapprove ProLiance as against the public interest. The Commission concluded that ProLiance was in the public interest, however, and denied the opponents’ petition. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
Indiana Gas Company, Inc., and Citizens Gas & Coke Utility (collectively…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Schneidewind v. ANR Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- General Motors Corp. v. TracySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Public Service Commission v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- City of Evansville v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States Gypsum Company v. Indiana Gas Company, Incorporated, and Proliance Energy LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. United States Steel Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Midwest Gas Services, Inc. And Midwest Gas Storage, Inc. v. Indiana Gas Company, Inc., Indiana Energy Services, Inc., and Proliance Energy, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Brenda and John Stachowski v. Estate of Daniel RadmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Bowyer v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.