Legal Opinion
Mikell v. County of Charleston
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 21, 2009No. 26749PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waller
We granted a writ of certiorari to review Mikell v. County of Charleston, 375 S.C. 552, 654 S.E.2d 92 (Ct.App.2007), in which the Court of Appeals held Charleston County Council (County) properly enacted a zoning ordinance for a Planned Development (PD) on Edisto Island. We reverse.
FACTS
The property in question is a 160 acre tract of land on Edisto Island which is known as Peters Point Plantation, a former cotton plantation owned by the Mikell family since *1561715. Peters Point forms a point, or peninsula, at the intersection of two tidal creeks: St. Pierre’s Creek on the north, and Fishing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Charleston County Parks & Recreation Commission v. SomersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc. v. Crane National Vendors Division of Unidynamics Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Capco of Summerville, Inc. v. J.H. Gayle Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Eagle Container Co., LLC v. County of NewberrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Arkay, LLC v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- Boehm v. Town of Sullivan's Island Bd. of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Helicopter Solutions, Inc. v. HindeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
- Arkay, LLC v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- Christ Central Ministries v. City of Columbia Bd. of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.