Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arkay, LLC v. City of Charleston

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 29, 2016No. Appellate Case No. 2014-001466; Opinion No. 5419Published

1DissentThomas, J.

I respectfully dissent. I agree with the circuit court that the City of Charleston Board of Zoning Appeals erred in denying Arkay a special exception use permit.

This appeal involves the interpretation of section 54-206(p) of the City of Charleston Code of Ordinances (2015). The majority holds the circuit court erred in reversing the Board’s denial of Arkay’s application for a special use exception and bases this holding on (1) a deferential standard of review in deciding how to apply subsection 54-206(p)(l), under which a stable may operate as a special exception use in certain zoning…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. McClanahan Ex Rel. Richland County Landowners & Taxpayers v. Richland County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Eagle Container Co., LLC v. County of NewberrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Gurganious v. City of BeaufortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API