Legal Opinion

Arkay, LLC v. City of Charleston

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 29, 2016No. Appellate Case No. 2014-001466; Opinion No. 5419PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, J.:

In this zoning case, the City of Charleston (the City), the City of Charleston Board of Zoning Appeals (the Board), the Andrew Pinckney Inn, and Michael A. Molony (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the circuit court’s reversal of the Board’s denial of Arkay, LLC’s (Arkay) application for a special use exception to operate a carriage horse stable. Appellants contend the court erred in (1) finding the special use exception ordinance described a stable as a “use” rather than a physical structure, (2) relying upon the law of horizontal property regime (HPR) as a means of satisfying…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Charleston County Parks & Recreation Commission v. SomersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Gurganious v. City of BeaufortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Beaufort County v. South Carolina State Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Lancaster County Bar Ass'n v. South Carolina Commission on Indigent DefenseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Mikell v. County of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arkay, LLC v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  2. Christ Central Ministries v. City of Columbia Bd. of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  3. Croft v. Town of SummervilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
  4. Grays Hill Baptist Church v. Beaufort Cnty.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
  5. John's Marine Service, Inc. v. Oconee County BZACourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API