Liuzza v. Brinkerhoff
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
On March 15, 1928, plaintiffs obtained judgment against Emilie Brinkerhoff in an action in tort for damages. On October 17, 1928, this action was commenced by plaintiffs as judgment creditors of Mrs. Brinkerhoff to set aside as fraudulent a conveyance of real property made by Mrs. Brinkerhoff to her daughter Dorothy Bell. Prior to the trial Mrs. Brinkerhoff died, and the cause was tried as to Mrs. Bell, without a substitution as to the deceased party. Judgment for the plaintiffs was entered therein on March 23, 1933, and this judgment was affirmed on appeal on December 20, 1934. (3 Cal. App.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stevens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Egan v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Burnett v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Carter v. J. W. Silver Trucking Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Estate of BuckhantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Liuzza v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Valentin v. ValentinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Wellborn v. WellbornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Marble v. WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.