Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Wiggins

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 29, 1926No. 25,050PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Appeal from a judgment ordered for defendant notwithstanding a verdict for plaintiff. The motion was in the alternative — for judgment non obstante or for a new trial and was made on the minutes of the court. At the close of the trial there was no motion by defendant for a directed verdict. The alternative motion was argued on the merits and so considered and decided, the absence of the motion for a directed verdict having been overlooked by counsel and not called to the attention of the court. After the order directing judgment there was a motion to vacate which was denied.

The one point for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knight v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Hemstad v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Sayer v. Harris Produce Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Netzer v. City of CrookstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Funkley v. RidgwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HeglandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Wilcox v. SchlonerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Raspler v. SengSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Timmins v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Krocak v. KrocakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API