Legal Opinion

Funkley v. Ridgway

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1924No. 23,775PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

This appeal involves only the first cause of action in the complaint. Plaintiff is a lawyer, and sued to recover the reasonable value for professional services. The answer contains a general denial and also this language:

“Further answering defendant alleges that on the 18th day of ■ March, 1918, at the city of Bemidji in said county defendant employed plaintiff to prosecute the divorce cause mentioned in the plaintiff’s complaint as her attorney for which (purpose she paid him the sum of $500.00 on said day in full for all matters pertaining to said divorce including all motions and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knight v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Hemstad v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Pinney v. FridleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864
  4. Lobdell v. GeibSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  5. Trainer v. LammersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. SchlonerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Cushman v. Cliff HouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Timmins v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Wilcox v. WigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Anderson v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API