Legal Opinion

Lee State Bank v. McElheny

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1924No. Docket No. 65PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This is a suit to reform a mortgage. Defendant Clarence J. McElheny owed plaintiff bank $25,400, evidenced by his notes, collaterally secured by drain orders of questioned validity. Some of his creditors threatened suit by attachment and the bank asked to be secured by mortgage. April 26, 1921, defendants, “Ha McElheny, individually, Clarence J. McElheny, individually, and Clarence J. McElheny and Ila McElheny, husband and wife,” executed and delivered to plaintiff bank a mortgage for $25,400, covering several descriptions of real estate, one being:

“A strip of land nineteen (19) feet in width…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Citizens' National Bank v. JudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People's Building & Loan Ass'n v. BillingMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ehle v. LookerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Ford Motor Company v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Hamade v. Sunoco, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Emery v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Goldberg v. Cities Service Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API