Marx v. Bellel
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Erazer, J. Assumpsit by Maria Marx against Elizabeth Bellel upon a promissory note. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant, from which defendant appeals. •
Prior to June, 1895, Prank Bellel had been engaged in keeping a saloon and restaurant, and had business relations with the Wyandotte Brewing Company, through Prank Marx, who was one of its stockholders, and is the son of the plaintiff. It is the claim of the plaintiff that in June Mr. Bellel was sick, and it was evident he could not go on with the business, and that he soon afterwards died; *632that his wife desired to go on with the business, with the assistance of her son. It is also claimed that Mrs. Bellel…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- West v. LarawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Kitchell v. MudgettMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Burdeno v. AmperseMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Emery v. LordMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Johnson v. SutherlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ehle v. LookerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Bennett v. HainesMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Collateral Liquidation, Inc. v. ManningMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Hackley National Bank v. JeannotMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Wendland v. Citizens Commercial & Savings BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979