Legal Opinion
Burcam Corp. v. Planning Bd. Tp. of Medford
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 29, 1979PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
168 N.J. Super. 508 (1979)
403 A.2d 921
BURCAM CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MEDFORD; TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MEDFORD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 30, 1979.
Decided May 29, 1979.
Before Judges FRITZ, BISCHOFF and MORGAN.
Mr. Timothy M. Prime argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Frederick W. Hardt argued the cause for respondent Planning Board of the Township of Medford (Messrs. Sever, Hardt and Main, attorneys).
Mr. Thomas Norman argued the cause for respondent…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Allendale Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses v. GrosmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Sandler v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF SPRINGFIELD TP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Crecca v. NuceraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- HILL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION v. City of PassaicNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Burcam Corp. v. Planning Board of MedfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
3Cited by18 opinions
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Urban Farms, Inc. v. Franklin LakesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Pizzo Mantin Group v. Township of RandolphSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Manalapan Holding Co. v. Planning Board of HamiltonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Dunbar Homes, Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of the Twp. of FranklinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.