Legal Opinion
Manalapan Holding Co. v. Planning Board of Hamilton
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 15, 1983PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
HANDLER, J.
This case focuses on the automatic approval provisions contained in the Municipal Land Use Law (MLUL) relating to preliminary approval of subdivision plans. The MLUL requires that a municipality act upon an application for preliminary subdivision approval within 95 days or the application will be approved automatically, N.J.S.A. 40:55D — 18 c." At the center of this controversy is how this provision of the MLUL detailing procedures for municipal approval, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-48 c, interrelates with the statutory provisions requiring county…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Levin v. Township of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Burcam Corp. v. Planning Bd. Tp. of MedfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Manalapan Holding Co. v. HAMILTON TP. PLAN. BD.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Lizak v. FariaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Burcam Corp. v. Planning Board of MedfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
3Cited by39 opinions
- Lizak v. FariaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Fallone Properties, L.L.C. v. Bethlehem Township Planning BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Allied Realty, Ltd. v. Borough of Upper Saddle RiverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Chesterbrooke Ltd. v. Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- EC, LLC v. Planning Bd. of EastamptonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.