Legal Opinion
Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of Manalapan
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 6, 1995PublishedCited by 1,543 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
COLEMAN, J.
This appeal requires us to determine whether two amendments to the Township of Manalapan’s (Township) zoning ordinance that exclude Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Home Depot) from Manalapan’s C-1 regional commercial shopping-center district are substantially consistent with the Township’s Master Plan (Master Plan). A majority in the Appellate Division, in an opinion published at 272 N.J.Super. 1, 639 A.2d 318 (App.Div.1994), held the amendments not arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable, and therefore substantially consistent with the Master Plan.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Meshinsky v. Nichols Yacht Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,543 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- A-18-14 Templo Fuente De Vida Corp v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of PittsburghSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. BarowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Nicholas v. MynsterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
1,538 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.