Legal Opinion

May v. Penton

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1932No. 1771PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RiNER, Justice.

The District Court of Fremont County sustained a general demurrer filed by the defendants to the amended petition of the plaintiff, in an action brought by May, now plaintiff in error, against Penton, et ah, now defendants in error. May declined to plead further and the court accordingly entered a judgment dismissing his action and for costs. These proceedings in error were brought to review that judgment, the only error assigned and relied on being the court’s ruling on the demurrer and the dismissal of the cause below, as described above.

The pleading thus successfully…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Colorado Coal & Iron Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Farm Investment Co. v. CarpenterWyoming Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Orchard v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Budd v. BishopWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. White v. Wheatland Irrigation DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Martin v. WolfsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Van Tassel Real Estate & Livestock Co. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  5. York v. JamesWyoming Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API