Legal Opinion

Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Cox

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1988No. 53003-3Published

1Opinion of the Court

110 Wn.2d 643 (1988)

757 P.2d 499

MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent,

v.

CLINTON C. COX, Appellant.

No. 53003-3.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

June 9, 1988.

Delay, Curran, Thompson & Pontarolo, P.S., by Joseph P. Delay, for appellant.

Huppin, Ewing & Anderson, P.S., by Robert F. Ewing, for respondent.

William R. Hickman and Pamela A. Okano on behalf of Washington Defense Trial Lawyers Association, amici curiae for respondent.

GOODLOE, J.

The defendant, Dr. Clinton C. Cox, appeals a judgment n.o.v. in favor of the plaintiff, Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company (MOE). The trial…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Claflin v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Haslund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Egede-Nissen v. Crystal Mountain, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API