Porter v. Muller
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order denying a new trial. Ansel Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
This action was commenced September 15, 1877, by David Porter against Christian Muller to foreclose a mortgage executed by Christian Muller and George Kroeckel on two adjoining quarter sections of land, of which they were equal owners as tenants in common, to wit, the northwest quarter of section 28, and the northeast quarter of section 29, township 2 north, range 8 east, Mount Diablo meridian, to secure their joint debt of $3,000 and interest. Upon the death ,of each original party, pending the action, his legal representative was substituted. The case has been before this court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cheesebrough v. MillardNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
- Stevens v. CooperNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
- Webb v. MeloyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Birnie v. MainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1874
- Porter v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wells v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People's Lumber Co. v. GillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Westerfeld v. New York Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Chamberlain Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Drovers National Bank v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.