Legal Opinion
In the Interest of K.M.B.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 7, 2002No. 2-01-264-CVPublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.
This is an appeal from a jury verdict terminating the parental rights of Kristin Butler (“Kristin”) and Phillip Burleson (“Phillip”) to K.M.B. Kristin and Phillip contend that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. Kristin also argues that (1) the trial court erred in overruling a Bat-son/Edmonson challenge based on race; (2) the trial court erred in overruling her objection to the jury charge because the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (“TDPRS”) provided no evidence that it made reasonable…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- In the Interest of J.T.G., H.N.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
- in the Interest of M.R.J.M., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
- in the Interest of J.J.O., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
- M.C. v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
- in the Interest of G.P., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2016
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.