Legal Opinion

Webb v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 20, 1996No. 93-501PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Defendant Navistar International Transportation Corporation (Navistar) appeals from a jury verdict that held defendant liable to plaintiffs Bruce and Martha Webb on a theory of strict products liability for a design defect and/or failure to warn plaintiffs of dangers inherent in the design of a tractor. A majority of the Court agrees to reverse and remand this case.

*122Justice Morse, Justice Peck and I hold that principles of comparative causation apply in this products liability action. We do not agree, however, to a general rule on when comparative principles apply in strict products liability…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Kennedy v. City of SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Company and Granite Mutual Insurance Company v. Hamilton Beach/proctor Silex, Inc., Docket No. 04-6282-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. Kellogg v. WyethDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2010
  3. Paquette v. Deere and Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  4. Sackman v. Liggett Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  5. Drake ex rel. J.D. v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API