Legal Opinion
James D. Harris v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 5, 1969No. 24051_1PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from the denial by the district court of appellant’s motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Perlman v. United States, 247 U.S. 7, 12-13, 38 S.Ct. 417, 62 L.Ed. 950 (1918); Continental Oil Company v. United States, 330 F.2d 347, 9 A.L.R.2d 1413 (9 Cir. 1964).
The subpoena in question directed an official of the California Canadian Bank to appear before a grand jury and produce the following records of the Bank regarding a trustee account in the name of appellant James D. Harris, an attorney: (a)…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Bank of Marin v. EnglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Harry I. Schwimmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Burrows v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Sanmina CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Travis Leon Wilson, Orrin Shaid, Jr., Louis Levin, Jerald Aaron White, Jasonn. Winthrop and David Levi WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Raymond A. Huberts, United States of America v. Shirley L. ShelleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.