Legal Opinion

Harry I. Schwimmer v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1956No. 15460_1PublishedCited by 203 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a denial by the District Court of motions to quash two( subpoenas duces tecum issued in a grand jury investigation.

The grand jury, one in session at St. Louis, Missouri, had engaged in investí-' gating tax evasions and official corruption in connection therewith. In the course of its proceedings, it desired' to have produced before it the files, papers and records of an attorney, Harry I. Schwimmer, as a means of obtaining information regarding the tax affairs of Sehwimmer’s clients and his handling of their situations. Among the matters which it…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by203 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  5. David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API