Legal Opinion
Hudgens v. WEXLER AND WEXLER
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 4, 2005No. 00 C 5216PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FILIP, District Judge.
Plaintiff Shadrack A. Hudgens (“Plaintiff’ or “Hudgens”) filed an amended complaint (D.E.19 1 ) on July 2, 2001, against Defendants Wexler and Wexler, Attorneys, and Norman Paul Wexler (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging, inter alia, violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), for discriminatory discharge based on race and unlawful retaliation (Counts I and II), and a violation of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, 29 U.S.C. § 1161 et seq. (“COBRA”) and the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bavelis v. Doukas (In Re Bavelis)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Anderson v. IaculloDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Mayo v. RECYCLE TO CONSERVE, INC.District Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Allen v. City of Des PlainesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017