Legal Opinion

Mayo v. RECYCLE TO CONSERVE, INC.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 13, 2011No. CIV. 2:10-629 WBS EFBPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF CLAIMS

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

Plaintiff Edison Mayo brought this action alleging race discrimination and retaliation against defendant Recycle to Conserve, Inc. (“RTC”). Defendant now moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Plaintiff, who is African-American, was a track driver for defendant or its predecessor from 1997 or 1998 to October 30, 2009, when he was involuntarily terminated. (Mayo Decl. ¶ 2 (Docket No.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robles v. Agreserves, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
  2. (PS) Brown v. U.S. Air ForceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. (PS) Lentz v. BernhardtDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. (PS) Singh v. AustinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. Ortiz v. Federal Bureau of Prisons AtwaterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API