Legal Opinion

Pelland v. State

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 11, 2007No. 2005-275-APublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice FLAHERTY,

for the Court.

Does the Department of Corrections (DOC) have the right to limit out-of-state travel for probationers previously convicted of sex offenses more restrictively than for other offenders? Must probationers challenging such a restrictive travel policy in a lawsuit do so using their own names, or may they use pseudonyms?

Joseph A. Pelland, 1 the only plaintiff who complied with a hearing justice’s order denying a motion to proceed pseudon-ymously and continued pressing the litigation in his own name, asks us to hold that the policy of the DOC all but denying…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Michael Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation, D/B/A Target Stores, a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  2. Sullivan v. ChafeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  3. Foster-Glocester Regional School Committee v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  4. Cicilline v. AlmondSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  5. Doe v. BurklandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Lead Industries, Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  2. City of Cranston v. Rhode Island Laborers' District CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. State v. PerrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  4. In Re DerderianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  5. City of Cranston v. Rhode Island Laborers' District CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API