Pelland v. State
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice FLAHERTY,
for the Court.
Does the Department of Corrections (DOC) have the right to limit out-of-state travel for probationers previously convicted of sex offenses more restrictively than for other offenders? Must probationers challenging such a restrictive travel policy in a lawsuit do so using their own names, or may they use pseudonyms?
Joseph A. Pelland, 1 the only plaintiff who complied with a hearing justice’s order denying a motion to proceed pseudon-ymously and continued pressing the litigation in his own name, asks us to hold that the policy of the DOC all but denying…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Michael Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation, D/B/A Target Stores, a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Sullivan v. ChafeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
- Foster-Glocester Regional School Committee v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Cicilline v. AlmondSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Doe v. BurklandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Lead Industries, Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- City of Cranston v. Rhode Island Laborers' District CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- In Re DerderianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- City of Cranston v. Rhode Island Laborers' District CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.