Legal Opinion
Michael Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation, D/B/A Target Stores, a Minnesota Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1979No. 77-1051PublishedCited by 169 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises out of a suit brought by Michael Lindsey (Lindsey) against Dayton-Hudson Corporation d/b/a Target Stores (Target), in which summary judgment was rendered against Lindsey on all counts of the complaint.
The complaint alleged five causes of action: False imprisonment, malicious prosecution, assault and battery, slander, and civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his reply brief on appeal Lindsey has conceded that Target’s position with respect to the civil rights count is correct; that issue will not be discussed in this opinion. Therefore,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by169 opinions
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bill W. Doe v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Doe v. C.A.R.S Protection Plus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- American Nurses' Association v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Herm v. StaffordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.