Legal Opinion

Weir v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 1983No. 45679PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.

This is an appeal from a decision of the probate court, ordering the Ohio Department of Transportation to pay the expenses of the Buckeye Pipeline Co. (“Buckeye”) for relocation of its pipeline. The Director of Transportation has appealed, assigning four errors for review. 1

The state of Ohio is constructing a limited-access highway, called 1-480, largely with federal funds. The Director of Transportation has seized, through eminent domain proceedings, several thousand feet of property from the Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) to use in the construction of 1-480. Buckeye maintains a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Masheter v. BoehmOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Sabol v. Pekoc, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Artesian Water Co. v. State, Department of Highways & TransportationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  4. Potomac Electric Power Company v. FugateSupreme Court of Virginia · 1971
  5. Fairbanks v. Power Oil Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Entertainment Associates, Ltd. v. Hamilton County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. At&T CORP. v. City of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
  3. Columbus Southern Power Co. v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Deaton v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
  5. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Continental ExpressCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API