Legal Opinion
Deaton v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 10, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 89CV1661PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
A jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Darrin Deaton, in the amount of $185,000, in this product liability case. The jury assessed $100,000 for past damages, and $85,000 for future damages. Now pending are Deaton’s motions for costs and pre-judgment interest. In addition, the Court must adjust the judgment to reflect workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to O.R.C. § 2317.45.
The Court grants Deaton’s motion for costs, denies Deaton’s motion for prejudgment interest, and concludes that the adjustment to the verdict for Deaton’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- White & White, Inc., Bluefield Supply Co., Crocker-Fels Co., and Ransdell Surgical, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Kalain v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Sales v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Kneisley v. Lattimer-Stevens Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Meredith v. Schreiner Transport, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Garonzik v. Whitman DinerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Echostar Satellite Corp. v. Advanced Communications Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Weseloh-Hurtig v. HepkerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Richard Baker, Jr. And Charlene S. Baker v. GoldblattCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992