Sabol v. Pekoc, Jr.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.
The sole question in this ease is whether the Court of Common Pleas erred in sustaining the demurrer to plaintiff’s petition.
It is fundamental that a demurrer, for its own purpose, admits the truth of all the well-pleaded facts in the pleading to which the demurrer is addressed. Therefore, we must assume for the purpose of a decision in this case that plaintiff’s decedent was in: jured and died, as- set out in the petition; that defendant fraudulently represented to plaintiff that defendant’s mother was the.owner of the premises upon which plaintiff’s decedent was working at the time she was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Metropolitan Trust Co. v. Bowman Dairy Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1938
- Cashman v. HedbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Mathis v. Camp Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
3Cited by36 opinions
- Norman Purnell, Administrator of the Estate of Armstead Land, A/K/A Armstad Land v. City of Akron v. Damon Campbell Carissa CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Shover v. Cordis Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bocek v. Inter-Insurance Exchange of Chicago Motor ClubIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Loyer v. BuchholzOhio Supreme Court · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.