Legal Opinion

Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Continental Express

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Decided August 5, 1999No. CV-371615PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

José A. Villanueva, Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

This matter is before the court on the motion of defendants Continental Express and Vito Bonventre to dismiss or alternately for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth more fully below, defendants’ motion is denied.

On December 10, 1883, the city of Cleveland granted plaintiff CEI’s predecessor, the Cleveland Electric Company, “permission to erect poles in streets, alleys and public grounds of the city of Cleveland, and to connect the same with wires for the purpose of furnishing power and light by means of electricity.” The state of Ohio granted the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Masheter v. BoehmOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Zangerle v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Holland Furnace Co. v. Trumbull Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Zangerle v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. State v. CollettOhio Supreme Court · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cluxton v. Fifth Third Bank (In Re Cluxton)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Township of GreenwichNew Jersey Tax Court · 2004
  3. In Re:Daniel Cluxton v.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Pandora Distribution, LLC v. Ottawa OH, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API