Cook v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MELANSON, Judge.
The state appeals from the district court’s judgment granting Sean M. Cook’s petition for post-conviction relief. For the reasons set forth below, we vacate the judgment.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
In the underlying criminal case, a jury found Cook guilty of rape, I.C. § 18-6101. The district court sentenced Cook to a unified term of thirty years, with a minimum *777period of confinement of ten years. The district court granted Cook’s subsequent I.C.R. 35 motion, reducing his sentence to a unified term of twenty years, with a minimum period of confinement of ten years. Cook then appealed…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Ortiz-Sandoval v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Hinton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SaenzIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
- Clayton Robert Adams v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
- Bias v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. LumpkinIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 2023