Legal Opinion

Cook v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 2014No. 41449PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELANSON, Judge.

The state appeals from the district court’s judgment granting Sean M. Cook’s petition for post-conviction relief. For the reasons set forth below, we vacate the judgment.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

In the underlying criminal case, a jury found Cook guilty of rape, I.C. § 18-6101. The district court sentenced Cook to a unified term of thirty years, with a minimum *777period of confinement of ten years. The district court granted Cook’s subsequent I.C.R. 35 motion, reducing his sentence to a unified term of twenty years, with a minimum period of confinement of ten years. Cook then appealed…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Ortiz-Sandoval v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Hinton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SaenzIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Clayton Robert Adams v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Bias v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. LumpkinIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API