Legal Opinion

Missouri Pac. R. Co. 5¼% Secured Serial Bondholders' Committee v. Thompson Farwell v. Thompson (Four Cases)

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1952No. 14495, 14503, 14504, 14508, 14509PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

These appeals challenge primarily the legality of two orders of the District Court entered in the reorganization proceedings of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company and its affiliates, including the International-Great Northern Railroad Company, under Section 77 of the Bankruptcy Act as amended, 11 U.S.C.A. § 205. The orders are No. 3879, entered October 5, 1951, which directs the Trustee of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor, to pay to the public holders of First and Refunding Mortgage Bonds of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company $33,478,575, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. MacKenzie v. HareSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Pillsbury v. United Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sun-Tek Industries, Inc. v. Kennedy Sky Lites, Inc. And Kenergy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. In the Matter of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor v. The First National Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  3. In Re Penn Central Transportation CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Kelm, Collector of Internal Revenue v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  5. Huston v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API