Legal Opinion
In re Greenfield
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 14, 1990PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The Commission on Judicial Conduct has found the petitioner, a Justice of the Supreme Court in Manhattan, guilty of misconduct for failing to render decisions promptly in eight cases pending before him. The. Commission also determined *295that a censure is the appropriate sanction. Petitioner has requested. review pursuant to the State Constitution which confers on this court plenary power to review the law and the facts as well as the sanction (NY Const, art VI, §22 [d]; Judiciary Law §44 [9]; see also, Matter of Quinn v State Commn. on Judicial Conduct, 54 NY2d 386, 391).…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Sardino v. State CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Matter of AlvinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Quinn v. State Commission on Judicial ConductNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- In re BoulangerNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- In re FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Miss. Com'n on Jud. Performance v. UuMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- Matter of DuckmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- DeCintio v. CohalanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Law Offices of Russell I. Marnell, P.C. v. BlydenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.