Legal Opinion

Sardino v. State Commission

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 1983PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The State Commission on Judicial Conduct has determined that petitioner, a Judge of the Syracuse City Court, engaged in various acts of misconduct demonstrating a pattern of injudicious behavior rendering him unfit to remain in judicial office. Pursuant to the State Constitution, petitioner commenced this proceeding to review the commission’s findings of fact, legal rulings and determination that he be removed from office (NY Const, art VI, § 22, subds a, d; Matter of Kuehnel v State Comm. on Judicial Conduct, 49 NY2d 465).

*289In 1973 petitioner was elected as a Judge of the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kuehnel v. State Commision on Judicial ConductNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. In re SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

4Cited by41 opinions

  1. In Re QuirkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. In Re BarrTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In re JungNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. People v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. In re ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API