People v. Shedrick
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
In each case, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendants each contend that the selection of grand and *1017petit jurors in Steuben County from a cross-section of one of three "jury districts”, rather than from the county-at-large, constituted a violation of Judiciary Law article 16.
In 1904, the Steuben County Board of Supervisors divided the county into three jury districts pursuant to legislation explicitly providing the board with such powers. (See, L 1892, ch 686, § 12 [14]; L 1902, ch 119.) In 1942, the enabling legislation was repealed,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. TarsiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. LeoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- People v. AngeloNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. BlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Ausch v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.