Legal Opinion

City of Portsmouth v. Weiss

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 17, 1926PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

This was an action against the city of Portsmouth to recover damages for flooding the lands of the plaintiff and destroying a crop of bulbs growing thereon. The flooding took place in July, 1922, and this action was not brought until July, 1924. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $7,300.

The city of Portsmouth owns and controls a canal or *99ditch eleven miles long and originally twenty-six feet wide and eleven feet deep. The flow of the canal was towards the north, and the waters draining from the swamp into it would normally flow in a northern direction and empty into Deep…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashley v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Hughes v. City of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Miller v. Town of PulaskiSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  4. Weisman v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Tonn v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Taylor v. City of CharlottesvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  3. Almond v. DaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  4. Marsh v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  5. Brooks v. BanksonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API