Legal Opinion

Semenza v. Kniss

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 2005No. 04-801PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Larry Semenza (Semenza) appeals from the Order of the District Court of the Ninth Judicial District, Teton County, dismissing his claim against Stockman’s Livestock Order Buying, Inc. (Stockman’s) for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred in determining that it lacked personal jurisdiction over Stockman’s.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶2 On April 3, 2003, Semenza filed his Complaint in District Court, naming Don Kniss (Kniss) and Stockman’s as defendants. In this Complaint, Semenza alleged, inter alia, that he was a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of BayersMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re the Marriage of BlaskovichMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Esther Knoepke v. Southwestern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Wallinder v. LagerquistMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In Re the Marriage of ZacherMontana Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. MONTANA PROFESSIONAL SPORTS, LLC. v. National Indoor Football League, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Wamsley v. NODAK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Mountain West Bank, N.A. v. Glacier Kitchens, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Nikolaisen v. Advance Transformer Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Nolan v. Riverstone Health CareMontana Supreme Court · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API