Legal Opinion

Nikolaisen v. Advance Transformer Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2007No. 05-727PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Warner

¶1 The Plaintiffs, Plentywood Electric and Robert and Judy Nikolaisen (collectively “Plentywood”), seek damages from Advance Transformer Co. (“Advance”) incurred when a fire destroyed Plentywood Electric. The fire was allegedly caused by a defective light ballast manufactured by Advance. The District Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District entered a default judgment in favor of Plentywood. Advanced moved for relief from the judgment. The motion was deemed denied as the District Court did not rule on it within the time provided. Advance now appeals from the denial of its motion to set aside…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Joseph Russell Realty Co. v. KenneallyMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Matthews v. Don K ChevroletMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Shields v. Pirkle Refrigerated Freight Lines, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Fonk v. UlsherMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Semenza v. KnissMontana Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Greater Missoula Area Federation of Early Childhood Educators & Related Personnel v. Child Start, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Brilz v. Metropolitan General InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Whitefish Credit Union v. ShermanMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Wittich Law Firm, P.C. v. O'ConnellMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Reservation Operations Ctr. LLC v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API