Legal Opinion

Barr v. Borough of Belmar

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 17, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

One of the grounds of appeal in this case is that the court erroneously decreed, inter alia, that appellants, defendants below, pay to the respondents, complainants below, as part of their taxed costs, a counsel fee of $2,500.

It is, of course, well settled that the allowance of counsel •fees in a chancery suit is within the sound discretion of the chancellor, and will not be disturbed on review, unless there is an abuse of discretion. Grunstra v. New-Ark Petroleum Corp., 111 N. J. Eq. 451, 453.

The record, on this point, is not very helpful. There is no proof of the filing of the usual…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Essex County Improvement Authority v. RAR Development AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  2. Texas Pipe Line Co. v. SnelbakerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Cintas v. American Car & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  4. Essex Cty. Imp. Auth. v. Rar Dev.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API