Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cintas v. American Car & Foundry Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 5, 1944Published

1DissentPerskie, J.

(Dissenting.) I am in accord with the result reached by the majority save that I regard inadequate the final allowance, under the order of July 9th, 1940, to Mr. Milton M. Unger, solicitor of the complainant, of $31,839.50 for his services in connection with the recovery of dividends for the benefit of the preferred stockholders in this cause. Cintas v. American Car and Foundry Co., 133 N. J. Eq. 301; 32 Atl. Rep. (2d) 90.

Ordinarily, I would not deem the mere difference of opinion as to the quantum of a counsel fee, for services rendered in a given cause, a sufficient justification for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glaser v. Achtel-Stetter's Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  2. Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. Grunstra v. New-Ark Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  4. Barr v. Borough of BelmarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  5. Beall v. New York & New Jersey Water Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API