Legal Opinion
Haco Drilling Co. v. Burchette
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 6, 1961No. 38996PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
This action was brought by Oscar Ray Burchette (plaintiff) against Haco Drilling Co., Inc., and Sam J. Whitlock, Administrator of the Estate of Thomas W. Hughes, Deceased, for damages resulting from the collision of two automobiles. Plaintiff alleged that at all of the times mentioned in the petition Thomas W. Hughes (the deceased) was acting in the scope of his employment as the agent, servant and employee of the defendant, Haco, so as to render Haco responsible for the acts and consequences of the acts of the said Hughes. It was further alleged that on September 3, 1957, at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mid-Continent Pipeline Co. v. CrauthersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Fairmont Creamery Co. v. CarstenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Shebester, Inc. v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Roring v. Hoggard Ex Rel. HoggardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Elias v. Midwest Marble and Tile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Marathon Battery Company v. KilpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Anderson v. Falcon Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Skinner v. Braum's Ice Cream StoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Anderson v. GobeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Pina v. Am. Piping Inspection, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.