Pina v. Am. Piping Inspection, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDSON, J.:
Facts & Procedural History
¶ 1 Octavio Pina (Petitioner) was employed as a pipeline installer by American Piping Inspection, Inc. At the time of his injury, he worked at an oilrig site approximately 130 miles away from his home residence. Petitioner traveled weekly to Employer's drilling site; he would work for 6 days and then return home on the weekend. Employer provided a daily per diem payment for lodging and meals incurred by Petitioner.
¶ 2 Employer used Petitioner's truck to haul work related equipment and materials and paid him $50 per day for the use of his truck. At the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Fent v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Protective Health Services State Department of Health v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- BROWN v. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT RESOURCES INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Skinner v. Braum's Ice Cream StoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- OAK TREE PARTNERS, LLC v. WILLIAMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
- JOHNSON v. MIDWEST CITY DEL CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- PINA v. AMERICAN PIPING INSPECTIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- BROWN v. INFRASTRUCTURE & ENERGY ALTERNATIVESCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.