Legal Opinion
Marathon Battery Company v. Kilpatrick
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 28, 1965No. 40675PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
This action originally was brought against Oklahoma Tire & Supply Company, hereinafter designated as “Otasco”, and Marathon Battery Company, referred to as “Marathon”. The action, filed July 7, 1962, sought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from breach of implied warranty by the named defendants. Subsequently, November 21, 1962, plaintiff was granted leave to file supplemental petition naming Mc-Crory Corporation, hereafter denominated as “McCrory”, an additional party defendant, for the reason such corporation owned some interest and exercised…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. And Cosmair, Inc. v. Edd Pruitt and Marjorie Ann PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Mustang Fuel Corporation, a Corporation v. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Northrip v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.