Legal Opinion

Maze v. Bennett

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1933No. 7532PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge:

This is a suit to remove as a cloud upon the several titles of the plaintiffs to a tract of some 500 acres a partially executed compromise in writing made in 1896 between their predecessors in title and other claimants of the land. The circuit court sustained a demurrer to the bill and plaintiffs appeal.

In 1896, the Bennetts and the Mazes were in litigation over the tract and they concluded a written compromise, stipulating (1) that the litigation should terminate, (2) that the Mazes should pay to the Bennetts $50.00 and “convey” unto them “1/16 of the oil and gas that may be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pusey v. GardnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Trader v. JarvisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Cranmer v. McSwordsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Maslin's Ex'rs v. HiettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Mitchell v. CarderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Floyd v. WatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Joy v. Chessie Employees Federal Credit UnionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Eurenergy Resources Corp. v. S & a Property Research, LLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Maze v. BennettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Positech International, Inc. v. ThalmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API