Legal Opinion

People v. Cannizzaro

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1934No. Crim. No. 2457PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DESMOND, J., pro tem.

The defendant appeals from judgments of conviction on two counts; the first charging him with violating chapter 339, Statutes of 1923, by possessing on or about April 26, 1933, “an instrument and weapon commonly known as a black-jack and billy”; the second charging a violation of the same law, as amended in 1931, Act 1970, section 2 (Deering’s Gen. Laws), and alleging that,' on or about the date mentioned, defendant was not a citizen of the United States, and that at that time he had “in his possession and custody, and under his control, a certain firearm, to-wit, a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Armour & Co. v. North DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. In Re RamerizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. Chan ChaunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. People v. CorderoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. People v. CorderoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. People v. RappardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API