Burgess v. Salmon
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to the Circuit Court of tbe United States for tbe Eastern District of Virginia. The facts are stated in tbe opinion of tbe court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt
The facts of this case, as agreed upon, were these: That Burgess was collector of internal revenue for tbe third collection district of Virginia, and in that capacity exacted from and received of Salmon & Hancock, and paid into tbe treasury of the United States, the sum of $377.80, as an additional tax of four cents a pound on a quantity of tobacco belonging to them. It was thus exacted on the third day of March, 1875, under the act of that date, which provides as follows : —
“ That sect. 3368 of the Revised Statutes be amended by striking out the words ‘twenty cents a pound,’ and inserting in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Arnold and Others v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- CARPENTER v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Lapeyre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Enrique Reyes Leyvas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Leidigh Carriage Co. v. StengelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.