Legal Opinion

Saur v. Rexford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1963No. Calendar 102, Docket 49,113Published

1Opinion of the Court

369 Mich. 338 (1963)

119 N.W.2d 669

SAUR

v.

REXFORD.

Calendar No. 102, Docket No. 49,113.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided February 7, 1963.

Rehearing denied May 9, 1963.

Philip L. Hogan, for plaintiff.

Hogan & Johnson, for plaintiff on application for rehearing.

Thomas D. Anderson, Sr., for defendants.

BLACK, J.

Plaintiff Saur and defendant Rexford took legal title, as trustees,[*] to the subject matter of this equity case. It consists of 120 acres of woodland in Marquette county. The tract was acquired by the 2 for themselves and 8 others, all being residents of Kent county, for hunting and fishing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burdeno v. AmperseMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Carlson v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Rothschild v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Woolfitt v. HistedMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Saur v. RexfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API