Saur v. Rexford
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
Plaintiff Saur and defendant Rexford took legal title, as trustees,* to the subject matter of this equity case. It consists of 120 acres of woodland in Marquette county. The tract was acquired by the 2 for themselves and 8 others, all being residents of Kent county, for hunting and fishing purposes. Over the years most of the 10 ceased using the tract for any purpose. Finally, in 1959, Saur filed this bill against Rexford and the latter’s wife, praying in the alternative for partition of or judicial sale of the subject premises; also for general relief.
The ease upon bill and answer went to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burdeno v. AmperseMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Rothschild v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Woolfitt v. HistedMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nash v. Duncan Park CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Saur v. RexfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1963