Woolfitt v. Histed
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Bay; Houghton (Samuel G.), J. Bill by Amos J. Woolfitt against Charles B. Histed to quiet title to land. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
Plaintiff sought by this bill and obtained a decree in the circuit court of Bay county, in chancery, quieting his; claimed absolute title in fee to 40 acres of land in: the township' of Merritt, Bay county, described as the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of section 30, town 13 north, of range 6 east. From that decree defendant appeals, claiming title to said land under a sheriff’s deed issued to him on an execution in a suit he commenced by attachment against John B. Schabel of Tacoma, Washington, to whom defendant claimed said land belonged.
It was shown upon the hearing that for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. DurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Burdeno v. AmperseMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Ready v. KearsleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Rothschild v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Adams v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kerschensteiner v. Northern Michigan Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- McLaughlin v. Ætna Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Nash v. Duncan Park CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Saur v. RexfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Saur v. RexfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1963