Legal Opinion

Harrod v. Baggett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 27, 1966No. 41090PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This tort action was instituted by the plaintiff, Evelyn N. Harrod, seeking damages for personal injuries sustained in the home of the defendants, O. B. Baggett and Margie P. Baggett. The trial court sustained the defendants’ demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence. From the order of the trial court overruling the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, the plaintiff appeals.

The amended petition alleged that the plaintiff was interested, as a prospective buyer, in the purchase of the defendants’ residence; that when she arrived at the defendants’ home, she was shown the premises by the defendants’…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Hendricks v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Beatty v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Pruitt v. TimmeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Jackson v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. TackerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Thomas v. Holliday by and Through HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Foster v. HardingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. McKinney v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Vreeland v. STATE, BOARD OF REGENTSCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API