Legal Opinion

Cox v. Waltz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1932No. 620PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFunk, J.

Counsel for defendant set up four principal grounds of error, to-wit: that the court erred—

First, in refusing to permit defendant to testify as a witness in his own behalf;

Second, in the rejection of certain evidence;

Third, in various, particulars in the charge; and

Fourth, in failing to direct a verdict for the defendant.

We will discuss them in the order named.

First. It is claimed that defendant should have been permitted to testify in this action notwithstanding the language of §11495 GC, even though Mrs. Hastings did not die as a result of the accident, because if the action had been for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ohio Power Co. v. Fittro, Admx.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Sikora v. BauerOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Boedker v. warren.E. Richards Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grable v. HendersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Helvie v. RattaOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. First National Bank v. PattonOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API